- Julian speaks out on the dirty secrets of family destruction
THE UNCRC IS A HODGEPODGE OF 54 Articles, many of which appear to be contradictory and less than necessary.
There is NO DOUBT WHATSOEVER that the intention of the use of the UNCRC in western societies is to empower the state to override the parents authority using the "best interests of the child" slogan.
The UNCRC is the forerunner of the current "Child protection" policies being implemented all over.
The question people need to ask, as in the UNCRC is "protected from whom?"
As there is no doubt that children's welfare has always been found with their parents and that the state has an abysmal record of caring for children the answer surely is "protected from the state!"
Yet the UNCRC and the "Child protection" policies are intended to be implemented and policed by the state.
This is surely a case of the fox guarding the henhouse and advocates of both must be told to abruptly get lost.
For those of you who want to read up more I give below the UN's own excuse for the existence of the UNCRC.
Even they can't hide the fact that it was designed with the very worst cases of institutional child abuse in mind and as such should have NO BEARING WHATSOEVER in family law cases which are PRIVATE CASES, ie brought by one parent against the other because there are NO PUBLIC CONCERNS FOR THE WELFARE OF THE CHILD, but simply because the applicant parent seeks to gain control of the child for the financial reliefs that they are awarded.
Press Release from the National Child Abuse Defense & Resource Center about False Accusations
Wendy's, Pepsi, Tylenol Turn Fingers Against False Accusers; Innocent Accused Parents Lack Legal Teams
Kens Comment: This same scenerio is being played on a worldwide level. Children are being stolen without the benefit of due process and are being used by social workers and other unemployables who rely on junk science for an incomes.
I will be adding more horrific articles about the Queensland, Australia child stealers in the near future
The assertions made by Warren Entsch on the Channel 9 Local News on Wednesday 27th April were clearly made before he had checked the facts. Warren clearly implied that he the visual simulations of False Cape by Save Our Slopes were not accurate and were some kind of political stunt by the greenies. This response from Warren Entsch proves why a web site such as FutureOfCairns is necessary. This web site presents all of the information, ours and the developers, so that people make up there own minds, and do not have believe whatever Warren says. The
We can’t read the councils minds, however before they closed their doors, there was a paper trail that provided insights in how this council operates. Two key documents of council origin were included in the Save Our Slopes submission that went to the Dept.
The stinging trees on the blue arrow walk have raspberry like fruit on them now. Don't eat the fruit, there are stories about someone who ate some and was stung down their throat and then couldn't breath when their throat swelled up (need to get the Myth Busters on to this one). I have been stung many times and my worst sting was from a dead leaf.
Despite the deadline that was printed on the "Did you know about thedevelopment at False Cape" leaflet, it is still worth sending ine-mails and letters. As far as we know, no decision has been madeso far.Admin
Let me express some of my 'unfounded fears' about landslides and earthworks.I just rechecked the 304 page Public Environment Report for False Cape to see if I missed the consultant's discussion of landslips. The Public Environment Report (PER) is the developer's major submission to the Commonwealth Government – it is the proposed project's Environmental Impact Assessment. I searched the PER's table of contents and read the relevant sections of the document and searched the documents for all the landside related keywords I could think
What is the Queensland Department of Child Safety?
...And to what extent do they carry out their vision of creating, "confident children and young people who are safe and valued...?"
Kens Comment: Well! What about you and your cronies come clean, mate. Beattie, you are a product of a broken home yourself and all have been told how child abuse is ongoing amongst victims. Want to step up and take me on ... or are you going to hide behind legislation that is supposed to prevent people from suing you for ongoing system child abuse? Look carefully at the Act, then tell me where the judicial relief provision is hidden, MATE. All these children have been stolen because your Act is illegal, mate.
Read on, for a kids-eye view of the QLD Dept. of Child Safety...
From the Mouth of Babe's, Part I
Monday, 18 April 2005
Dear Mr. Peter Beattie,
I am eight years old and have been forced to go to unusual measures to get your attention and ask you to perform your duty of care towards the charges of my home state, Queensland. What has happened to my family and I must not happen to any other family in your charge and under your duty of care.