Nullifying the Constitution
Date: 15/03/2006 13:48:40
From: "John Wilson" |jhwilson at acay.com.au|

Dear Joe,

When an action in a Court involves the Constitution, 78B Notices are sent to all the Attorney-Generals around the country to inform them that the Constitution or part/s of it are one or more of the aspects of that action which is to be tried.

The function, right, responsibility and duty of a Jury is to "find out what is the law, judge the justice of the law, determine if the law is being appropriately applied, judge the moral intentions of the parties, (etc).", and each Juror must judge all the issues of fact and law "entirely according to their conscience".

FRAUDS: Federal Judges must be appointed by the Governor-General and State Judges by the State Governors who must have been appointed by Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second. However, Privy Council and the Foreign & Commonwealth Office in London confirm that the Queen does not and can not appoint the Governor-General nor the Governors because she is the Head of State of the United Kingdom and has no executive powers exercisable in the Commonwealth of Australia. Therefore, any appointments made by these false representatives of the Queen are also fraudulent and those "Judges" have no authority or jurisdiction, whatsoever.

In any action, both parties must give their clear and unequivocal consent to be without a Jury. Without that consent, the Court has no Jurisdiction to proceed summarily and the Jurisdiction of the Court must be challenged. This Challenge can only be judged by a Special Jury. Should a Judge or Magistrate disregard or dismiss this Challenge, then he or she is liable to imprisonment for 5 years. Should a Judge or Magistrate disregard or dismiss this Challenge, that is a violation of Due Process and the Rule of Law.