QLDTownsville: Corrective Services Minister Judy Spence has announced plans to establish a female prison camp in north Queensland.

Full article at: http://altnews.com.au/drop/node/view/1504

WOMEN SAY NO TO WAR
On International Women's Day, Women Take to the Streets of Lismore

On Wednesday, March 8th, International Women's Day, women will take to the streets of Lismore as they join an international movement of women calling for an end to the Iraq war.

Women will congregate in Lismore to join the Women Say No To War Campaign that was launched by CODEPINK: Women for Peace in early January, bringing together women from around the world-from the US to Iraq to Britain to Japan to Australia - in a campaign aimed at ending the Iraq war and all attacks on Iraqi civilians in 2006.

From: callemity
Date: Tues, Feb 14 2006

It's hardly a secret that about half the adult unions in this country divorce/break down. The over stretched Family Court System testifies to this week to week. However, Australians participate and believe in one of the most 'ineffective' Government programs created in this country so far in its shortish political autonomy. I refer to The Child Support Agency of Australia.

(Kens Comment) There are a lot more articles exposing this atrocity here and also on www.lophatham.com , the public site and main boards. (63 members)

Society for Cutting and Ripping Up Feminist Fantasies.
The dawn of masculism and masculist ideology!

Feminism is a social experiment that has failed; it's time to move on.  Feminists will read this Manifesto with horror and will want to starve the nut who wrote it, but here goes.  

The following document is about 30 years overdue and needs to be published globally to strike a balance with radical femimist lunacy.

Ken's Comment: I thought it was kinda radical but what the hell

Quote: Know your rights before you talk to anyone from CPS/DCF or let them in your house, they won't tell you your rights. CPS/DCF can't do anything without your consent, demand a warrant and speak with an attorney first before speaking with anyone from CPS/DCF, it could cost you your children." (unquote)

Recent newspaper articles about raising children in today's society have highlighted the need for parents to responsibly 'take control' and exercise their right to train their children with love and firm boundaries.

You know the absolute destruction of "right and wrong" is complete when the global problem of paternity fraud appears to be just a matter of judicial bias and fodder for escapist television shows like Desperate Housewives.

A writ has been issued against the Federal Minister for Family & Community Services claiming damages for the maladministration of the MAGILL child support agency account. Documents were served to the Australian Government Solicitor's Office in Canberra today via process server.

- Julian speaks out on the dirty secrets of family destruction

THE UNCRC IS A HODGEPODGE OF 54 Articles, many of which appear to be contradictory and less than necessary.

There is NO DOUBT WHATSOEVER that the intention of the use of the UNCRC in western societies is to empower the state to override the parents authority using the "best interests of the child" slogan.

The UNCRC is the forerunner of the current "Child protection" policies being implemented all over.

The question people need to ask, as in the UNCRC is "protected from whom?"

As there is no doubt that children's welfare has always been found with their parents and that the state has an abysmal record of caring for children the answer surely is "protected from the state!"

Yet the UNCRC and the "Child protection" policies are intended to be implemented and policed by the state.

This is surely a case of the fox guarding the henhouse and advocates of both must be told to abruptly get lost.

For those of you who want to read up more I give below the UN's own excuse for the existence of the UNCRC.

Even they can't hide the fact that it was designed with the very worst cases of institutional child abuse in mind and as such should have NO BEARING WHATSOEVER in family law cases which are PRIVATE CASES, ie brought by one parent against the other because there are NO PUBLIC CONCERNS FOR THE WELFARE OF THE CHILD, but simply because the applicant parent seeks to gain control of the child for the financial reliefs that they are awarded.